Escaped Thoughts

Tue, Nov 08, 2005

Sigh

I went to vote today, and it was deeply depressing. Since I have this crazy desire to have a system where, you know, votes actually count, I refuse to use the current electronic voting machines. Yet, when I refused the electronic card and asked for a paper ballot, I was told there was no paper-ballot voting. At least when I insisted that yes, there in fact was paper ballot voting, and the desk-workers found someone with a clue, he was happy to give me one, but it was so very sad. First, the poll workers were so badly trained that many people who were only somewhat aware of the issue would probably have just buckled and been pushed into using the electronic voting machines—when poll workers are actively disenfranchising people through poor training, that's just wrong. Second, the clueful person said, “We were just commenting about how there has only been one paper ballot today.” And third, that one ballot was Laura. So the poor training probably didn't even come into play, which is even worse. (I suppose it's possible that one or two people were dissuaded after requesting paper, but I doubt it).

Why are people such sheep? Is it because they trust machines blindly? Or trust authority blindly? I don't even know which is worse. Maybe it's just apathy—I was talking with some co-workers today, who I know know better than to trust the current machines, but they still voted by machine. It's sad. Rigging elections at a national level is now something that requires the know-how of a high-school student, and most people don't care. Now, I'm not politically active—I've never written my congressperson—but if my only option were to vote using the currently-available machines, I wouldn't vote. I'd make a scene at the polling place, I'd write to my representatives at every level, and I'd probably protest at the polls at every election and try to get others to do the same. Would anyone care then? I doubt it.

In summary: the most important vote I feel like I made today was requesting a paper ballot—and it feels like it was a write-in.

Other's Thoughts

From the mind of Jeff Hunter - Tue, Nov 08, 2005

I voted in Pennsylvania today using one of the old lever machines. I would have been much more confident in my vote being counted if I had voted on a computer. Sure, computer voting terminals have problems, but the physical machines have just as many. Over time, I'm sure the kinks will be worked out. Billions (trillions?) of dollars in transactions are handled on the Internet every day, and most people I know care much more about their money than their vote.

From the mind of Stuart - Tue, Nov 08, 2005

I have no problem with computer voting. I have a problem with badly designed systems that have absolutely no trustworthy auditing trail.

I'm all for electronic voting machines that aren't designed in such a way that widespread loss of votes and/or rigging of elections is laughably easy.

From the mind of Stuart - Tue, Nov 08, 2005

To be a bit more clear, my issue is this: paper ballots are readable in exactly the same way they are written, such that I can see exactly what someone doing a hand recount would see. The current electronic system has nothing. The card someone turns in might have their vote. Or it might have completely different votes. It might be blank. It might be a grocery list. There is *absolutely nothing* that provides a verifiable backup of any kind.

Liberate Your Thoughts:

Name:
URL/Email:(optional)
Title:(optional)
Comment:

Comments containing links may be placed in a holding area pending review.

TrackBack ping me at: http://www.escapedthoughts.com/weblog/society/P051108sheepvote.trackback